Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:18
What’s next?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Why do some mothers hate their daughters especially when they're the eldest?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Thank you.
Why would a spouse cheat if the marriage is good?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Children of slain Minnesota lawmaker Melissa Hortman: 'We are devastated' - ABC News
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
This Powerful Airplane Engine Has Been Around For Over 70 Years & Is Still Used Today - SlashGear
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Don’t Try Flying With Erewhon Sunflower Seeds - The Cut
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Options Markets Show Traders Reposition as Mideast Tension Fades - Bloomberg
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.